Summary

Provide a tool that allows people managing local repository mirrors to pick which package and updates should be added to their mirror.

Release Note

For administrator managing a large number of machines, it is now possible to use WebMirrorManager to pick which packages and updates are to be deployed in their production environment, independently of Ubuntu's releases.

Rationale

Use Cases

Assumptions

Design

Implementation

UI

Test/Demo Plan

It's important that we are able to test new features, and demonstrate them to users. Use this section to describe a short plan that anybody can follow that demonstrates the feature is working. This can then be used during testing, and to show off after release.

This need not be added or completed until the specification is nearing beta.

Outstanding Issues

This should highlight any issues that should be addressed in further specifications, and not problems with the specification itself; since any specification with problems cannot be approved.

BoF agenda and discussion

Use this section to take notes during the BoF; if you keep it in the approved spec, use it for summarising what was discussed and note any options that were rejected.

MathiasGug: The issue of signing the Release files should be addressed. As customized repositories are generated, they need to be signed with a valid gpg key which also need to be installed on the client systems.

MathiasGug: The backend needs to take care of pulling in the correct dependencies when moving packages from one repository to the other. Other archive consistency checks may be needed.

MathiasGug: Third party repository integration - should this be considered ? It may require much more archive consistency checks to be done.

ThierryCarrez: More use cases ? Betty manages a large Ubuntu workstations network. She wants to be able to test updates in her test environment, then push updates to a set of pilot users, then push updates to everyone else. (require more than just two areas (staging+production) to be built from the original mirror, maybe define two by default but allow more)

ThierryCarrez: More use cases ? Johnny manages a small Ubuntu workstations network in a legal-aware company. He needs to enable a couple of multiverse packages, but for obvious company-compatible licensing reasons cannot enable the whole repository. (it's not just about -security or -updates)

ThierryCarrez: More use cases ? Herbert works with Betty, he packages company software as proper .deb packages. He can leverage the existing WebMirrorManager system to pilot-test and distribute that software to his users. (offer the possibility to add custom repos... or even import packages directly ?)

WilliamGrant: This will be greatly affected (and will somewhat affect) the ArchiveReorganisation spec. I'll be at the discussion on Thursday to bring the discussed ideas over.


CategorySpec

WebMirrorManager (last edited 2009-05-12 15:36:38 by mathiaz)