MOTUApplication

Differences between revisions 3 and 4
Revision 3 as of 2009-05-14 21:50:12
Size: 1869
Editor: 187
Comment:
Revision 4 as of 2009-05-15 13:35:46
Size: 5553
Editor: 187
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 15: Line 15:
''Tell us a bit about yourself.'' I am 25 years old. I lives in France. I works as an accountant for a company, not really on the IT market. All my work on IT is done on my spare-time, after the work.
Line 18: Line 18:
''Tell us how and when you got involved, what you liked working on and what you could probably do better.'' I started with Hoary as a simple user, searching a Linux distribution easy to use. Well, it's more the look and the wallpaper which convince me first.

I was primary a user and since Dapper unstable release, an adventurous tester, building some programs to test/crash them. My first compiled was compiz, and I keep the interest for eyes-candies and goodies.

With Edgy, I began to report bugs. With no knowledge on coding or packaging, my help was quite limited. I first good experience was testing/patching/building synaptic to fix a [[https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/synaptic/+bug/62298|segfault]].

Next step was to try to create debian package. I also begin to work also on Debian. My first upload on Ubuntu was avant-window-navigator, a [[https://edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/avant-window-navigator/0.2.1-0ubuntu1|new package]]. I am now part of the upstream team.

Now, I have severals packages maintained on [[http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=julien.lavergne@gmail.com|Debian]], and some packages that I try to keep as clean as possible on Ubuntu (see below). I also try to help during some French Ubuntu Parties.
Line 21: Line 29:
 * Keep my packages on Debian and Ubuntu in sync and as clean as possible, including bug triaging, patches, and uploads :
  * avant-window-navigator and awn-extras-applets (+ I am part of the upstream team)
  * screenlets (no upstream activity, many patches)
  * moap
  * desktop-data-model
  * gnome-launch-box
  * nautilus-image-converter (newly adopted)

 * Keep an eye on others packages on Ubuntu :
  * cairo-dock, another dock-like (New upload with REVU, and some updates)
  * conduit (some bug triages and bugfix uploads)
  * ogmrip and related packages (mkvtoolnix, gpac)

 * Some "QA" activities, like updated packages with not many activity (penguinTV, phat). Recently, I also tried to re-sync with Debian as many packages as I can for Karmic, forwarded some changes to Debian to avoid a merge.
Line 22: Line 45:
Some examples of my works :
 * Maintaining [[https://edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/avant-window-navigator|avant-window-navigator]] and [[https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/awn-extras-applets|awn-extras-applets]].
  * Bug triaging (247 opens, 38 still open for Awn, 160/36 for Awn-extras, with help of upstream)
  * [[https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/300683|Sync]] or [[https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/327443|Update]]
  * [[https://edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/avant-window-navigator/0.3.2-0ubuntu2|Upload]] [[https://edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/awn-extras-applets/0.2.6-2ubuntu4|patches]]
 * Sync for karmic : average of 40s packages to re-sync with Debian.
Line 23: Line 53:
''Let us know what you worked on, with which development teams / developers you cooperated and how it worked out.''
## As a per-package uploader, please give us some insight into the package maintenance and bug situation since you're working on it.
 * Bug triage
 * Patches (C and Python)
 * Forwarding patches/changes
 * Merges/Syncs
 * New packages.
Line 27: Line 60:
 * Improve my knowledge about packaging other than python and C + autotools
 * Search more on other distributions fixes/improvements (like patches)
 * Improve my communication and my English.
Line 30: Line 66:
I have 2 goals for the future :
 * Continue to work on my preferred packages.
 * Continue QA activity:
  * Try to work better with Debian by reducing the merges, forwarding changes etc ...
  * Try to to add patches from downstream distribution or users (I was amazed by the numbers of bugs with attached patches on Launchpad).

To be general, I would like to add as mush as possible works done by people around Ubuntu development (Debian, upstream, downstream, users ...).
Line 31: Line 75:
''Please describe what you like least in Ubuntu and what thoughts do you have about fixing it.'' I think Ubuntu have a very big potential, but it's not fully exploited. Debian make a very good job and I think being in sync with them for most of the packages is important. Also, I am sure downstream distribution have opportunities to offer (like patches, or idea to improve packages). There is also some patches posted directly by the users which can improve the state of some packages. And of course, upstream is the most important part. I think Ubuntu can improve in this areas, and I'll try to help to improve this aspect (see my Plans for the future).

I, Julien Lavergne, apply for MOTU.

Name

Julien Lavergne

Launchpad Page

https://launchpad.net/~gilir

Wiki Page

https://wiki.ubuntu.com/gilir

Who I am

I am 25 years old. I lives in France. I works as an accountant for a company, not really on the IT market. All my work on IT is done on my spare-time, after the work.

My Ubuntu story

I started with Hoary as a simple user, searching a Linux distribution easy to use. Well, it's more the look and the wallpaper which convince me first.

I was primary a user and since Dapper unstable release, an adventurous tester, building some programs to test/crash them. My first compiled was compiz, and I keep the interest for eyes-candies and goodies.

With Edgy, I began to report bugs. With no knowledge on coding or packaging, my help was quite limited. I first good experience was testing/patching/building synaptic to fix a segfault.

Next step was to try to create debian package. I also begin to work also on Debian. My first upload on Ubuntu was avant-window-navigator, a new package. I am now part of the upstream team.

Now, I have severals packages maintained on Debian, and some packages that I try to keep as clean as possible on Ubuntu (see below). I also try to help during some French Ubuntu Parties.

My involvement

  • Keep my packages on Debian and Ubuntu in sync and as clean as possible, including bug triaging, patches, and uploads :
    • avant-window-navigator and awn-extras-applets (+ I am part of the upstream team)
    • screenlets (no upstream activity, many patches)
    • moap
    • desktop-data-model
    • gnome-launch-box
    • nautilus-image-converter (newly adopted)
  • Keep an eye on others packages on Ubuntu :
    • cairo-dock, another dock-like (New upload with REVU, and some updates)
    • conduit (some bug triages and bugfix uploads)
    • ogmrip and related packages (mkvtoolnix, gpac)
  • Some "QA" activities, like updated packages with not many activity (penguinTV, phat). Recently, I also tried to re-sync with Debian as many packages as I can for Karmic, forwarded some changes to Debian to avoid a merge.

Examples of my work / Things I'm proud of

Some examples of my works :

Areas of work

  • Bug triage
  • Patches (C and Python)
  • Forwarding patches/changes
  • Merges/Syncs
  • New packages.

Things I could do better

  • Improve my knowledge about packaging other than python and C + autotools
  • Search more on other distributions fixes/improvements (like patches)
  • Improve my communication and my English.

Plans for the future

General

I have 2 goals for the future :

  • Continue to work on my preferred packages.
  • Continue QA activity:
    • Try to work better with Debian by reducing the merges, forwarding changes etc ...
    • Try to to add patches from downstream distribution or users (I was amazed by the numbers of bugs with attached patches on Launchpad).

To be general, I would like to add as mush as possible works done by people around Ubuntu development (Debian, upstream, downstream, users ...).

What I like least in Ubuntu

I think Ubuntu have a very big potential, but it's not fully exploited. Debian make a very good job and I think being in sync with them for most of the packages is important. Also, I am sure downstream distribution have opportunities to offer (like patches, or idea to improve packages). There is also some patches posted directly by the users which can improve the state of some packages. And of course, upstream is the most important part. I think Ubuntu can improve in this areas, and I'll try to help to improve this aspect (see my Plans for the future).


Comments

If you'd like to comment, but are not the applicant or a sponsor, do it here. Don't forget to sign with @SIG@.


Endorsements

As a sponsor, just copy the template below, fill it out and add it to this section.


TEMPLATE

== <SPONSORS NAME> ==
=== General feedback ===
## Please fill us in on your shared experience. (How many packages did you sponsor? How would you judge the quality? How would you describe the improvements? Do you trust the applicant?)

=== Specific Experiences of working together ===
''Please add good examples of your work together, but also cases that could have handled better.''
=== Areas of Improvement ===


CategoryMOTUApplication

gilir/MOTUApplication (last edited 2009-07-18 18:09:25 by cpe-72-229-211-50)