TechnicalBoardAgenda

Differences between revisions 1 and 77 (spanning 76 versions)
⇤ ← Revision 1 as of 2005-05-28 20:31:13 →
Size: 1368
Editor: adsl-213-190-44-43
Comment: imported from the old wiki
← Revision 77 as of 2006-03-13 00:40:16 → ⇥
Size: 2156
Editor: 83-216-156-196
Comment: new images for installer vulnerability?
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 9: Line 9:
{{{Tuesday 31 May 2005 at 2000 UTC}}} {{{2006-03-14 at 2000UTC}}}
Line 11: Line 11:
in channel '''#ubuntu-meeting''' on irc.freenode.net. The agenda will include the following: in channel '''#ubuntu-meeting''' on chat.freenode.net. The agenda will include the following:
Line 15: Line 15:
 * Review MaintainerCandidates
 * Review seed change proposals		  * Review [https://launchpad.net/people/ubuntu-core-dev/+members core developer candidates]
 * Review [https://launchpad.net/people/ubuntu-dev/+members developer candidates]
Line 20: Line 20:
 * Consider DanielHolbach (dholbach) as uploader for '''main'''.
 * Consider GerardoDiGiacomo (astharot) as uploader for '''universe'''.
 * Consider StephanHermann (\sh or shermann) as uploader for '''universe'''.
 * Consider BrandonHale (tseng) as uploader for '''main''' for Mono transition.
 * Consider ReinhardTartler (siretart) as uploader for '''universe'''.		  * PaulSladen. I was granted main upload at TB in January 2005... but didn't use it owing to not producing usplash in the required timeframe. Since January 2006 I've actually been motivated to do sensible amount of Ubuntu related-work and I'm finding it frustrating, particularly relating to one-liner fixes where the overhead of multiple updates via the bugtracker is largest. Sorry I missed the previous 2006-02-28 meeting (owing to meeting Crispin about AppArmour and integration with Ubuntu...).
 * http://people.ubuntu.com/~fabbione/irclogs/archived/2005-01/ubuntu-meeting-2005-01-18.html | grep -A20 ^06:48.*sladen

 * ColinWatson: Should we produce new installer and CD images for this [http://www.ubuntu.com/usn/usn-262-1 serious installer vulnerability]? At present, users installing Breezy must make sure to upgrade from -security before adding any other local users, which I think will result in a number of vulnerable systems in practice. On the other hand, it's not as if we can rev shipit CDs at this point.
Line 27: Line 26:
 
Line 31: Line 30:
 * Update the agenda for the next meeting   * Update the agenda for the next meeting
----
CategoryUbuntuTeams

TechnicalBoardAgenda

Please use this page to add items for the Agenda of the Ubuntu Technical Board. Please see the [http://www.ubuntulinux.org/community/processes/governance Ubuntu Governance] page for details on participation.

The next meeting of the Board will be on:

2006-03-14 at 2000UTC

in channel #ubuntu-meeting on chat.freenode.net. The agenda will include the following:

  • PaulSladen. I was granted main upload at TB in January 2005... but didn't use it owing to not producing usplash in the required timeframe. Since January 2006 I've actually been motivated to do sensible amount of Ubuntu related-work and I'm finding it frustrating, particularly relating to one-liner fixes where the overhead of multiple updates via the bugtracker is largest. Sorry I missed the previous 2006-02-28 meeting (owing to meeting Crispin about AppArmour and integration with Ubuntu...).

  • http://people.ubuntu.com/~fabbione/irclogs/archived/2005-01/ubuntu-meeting-2005-01-18.html | grep -A20 ^06:48.*sladen

  • ColinWatson: Should we produce new installer and CD images for this [http://www.ubuntu.com/usn/usn-262-1 serious installer vulnerability]? At present, users installing Breezy must make sure to upgrade from -security before adding any other local users, which I think will result in a number of vulnerable systems in practice. On the other hand, it's not as if we can rev shipit CDs at this point.

  • Other business
    • Update the agenda for the next meeting

CategoryUbuntuTeams

TechnicalBoardAgenda (last edited 2024-04-23 19:10:37 by seb128)