TechnicalBoardAgenda

Differences between revisions 1 and 64 (spanning 63 versions)
⇤ ← Revision 1 as of 2005-05-28 20:31:13 →
Size: 1368
Editor: adsl-213-190-44-43
Comment: imported from the old wiki
← Revision 64 as of 2006-01-17 19:12:32 → ⇥
Size: 2562
Editor: xdsl-84-44-225-120
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 9: Line 9:
{{{Tuesday 31 May 2005 at 2000 UTC}}} {{{2006-01-17 at 2000UTC}}}
Line 11: Line 11:
in channel '''#ubuntu-meeting''' on irc.freenode.net. The agenda will include the following: in channel '''#ubuntu-meeting''' on chat.freenode.net. The agenda will include the following:
Line 15: Line 15:
 * Review MaintainerCandidates
 * Review seed change proposals		  * Review [https://launchpad.net/people/ubuntu-core-dev/+members core developer candidates]
 * Review [https://launchpad.net/people/ubuntu-dev/+members developer candidates]
Line 19: Line 19:
 * Design of first-time sudo help (MartinPitt)
 * Status of popcon.u.c (LucasNussbaum, also see [http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ubuntu.devel/14364 thread on u-devel@]): popcon.u.c hasn't been updated since June 2005. While it's mostly useless for main packages (all users have the default set of packages installed), it is very useful for universe to determine wich packages should get the more attention. Could popcon be fixed ? By whom ? How could we ask our users to enable it (u-d-a@ email, blog entries) ? (it is disabled by default for obvious privacy reasons)
 * Xubuntu Dapper(JaniMonoses) - UVF exception for Xfce and related packages? Possibility of ISO building on and downloading from Canonical machines (not necessarily daily)?
 * Joey Hess (Debian Developer) request to remove his name for packages which are not bit-identical to code/binaries as in Debian. (Read his request to ubuntu-motu: http://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-motu/2006-January/000139.html ). (StephanHermann)
   Eventually I can not attend this meeting, but here are some points for discussion:
      1. Introduction of new fields for debian/control (Debian-Maintainer, Ubuntu-Maintainer, including changes in dpkg-genchanges.pl)
      2. Replacing Maintainer and Uploader (aka Co-Maintainer) field manually and adding a note in debian/copyright
      3. Nothing at all, and let's move on
 * libpam-foreground integration (MatthewGarrett)
## ======================== Add your agenda items above this line, INCLUDE YOUR NAME and plan to ATTEND THE MEETING ===================
Line 20: Line 30:
 * Consider DanielHolbach (dholbach) as uploader for '''main'''.
 * Consider GerardoDiGiacomo (astharot) as uploader for '''universe'''.
 * Consider StephanHermann (\sh or shermann) as uploader for '''universe'''.
 * Consider BrandonHale (tseng) as uploader for '''main''' for Mono transition.
 * Consider ReinhardTartler (siretart) as uploader for '''universe'''.

## ======================== Add your agenda items above this line, INCLUDE YOUR NAME and plan to ATTEND THE MEETING ===================
 
Line 32: Line 34:
----
CategoryUbuntuTeams

TechnicalBoardAgenda

Please use this page to add items for the Agenda of the Ubuntu Technical Board. Please see the [http://www.ubuntulinux.org/community/processes/governance Ubuntu Governance] page for details on participation.

The next meeting of the Board will be on:

2006-01-17 at 2000UTC

in channel #ubuntu-meeting on chat.freenode.net. The agenda will include the following:

  • Design of first-time sudo help (MartinPitt)

  • Status of popcon.u.c (LucasNussbaum, also see [http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ubuntu.devel/14364 thread on u-devel@]): popcon.u.c hasn't been updated since June 2005. While it's mostly useless for main packages (all users have the default set of packages installed), it is very useful for universe to determine wich packages should get the more attention. Could popcon be fixed ? By whom ? How could we ask our users to enable it (u-d-a@ email, blog entries) ? (it is disabled by default for obvious privacy reasons)

  • Xubuntu Dapper(JaniMonoses) - UVF exception for Xfce and related packages? Possibility of ISO building on and downloading from Canonical machines (not necessarily daily)?

  • Joey Hess (Debian Developer) request to remove his name for packages which are not bit-identical to code/binaries as in Debian. (Read his request to ubuntu-motu: http://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-motu/2006-January/000139.html ). (StephanHermann)

    • Eventually I can not attend this meeting, but here are some points for discussion:
      1. Introduction of new fields for debian/control (Debian-Maintainer, Ubuntu-Maintainer, including changes in dpkg-genchanges.pl)
      2. Replacing Maintainer and Uploader (aka Co-Maintainer) field manually and adding a note in debian/copyright
      3. Nothing at all, and let's move on

  • libpam-foreground integration (MatthewGarrett)

  • Other business
  • Update the agenda for the next meeting

CategoryUbuntuTeams

TechnicalBoardAgenda (last edited 2024-04-23 19:10:37 by seb128)