MainInclusionReportJavaAccessBridge
Differences between revisions 1 and 2
|
⇤ ← Revision 1 as of 2008-07-07 17:58:42
Size: 3150
Comment: new page (work in progress)
|
Size: 1548
Comment:
|
| Deletions are marked like this. | Additions are marked like this. |
| Line 2: | Line 2: |
'''Note''': when writing a report this template should be vigorously edited; as a rule of thumb, every individual point should be replaced with a description of the actual situation in the package in question. The purpose of the report is to convey information to the reviewer, so there is no problem with varying the text in the bullet items, or with adding additional information. Please be informative, and in particular be thorough in investigating and explaining any weaknesses and problems with the package. The purpose of the report is to show to the reviewer that the package has been properly investigated, and to give the reviewer the information from that investigation, for their decision. |
|
| Line 9: | Line 5: |
| 0. ''Availability:'' [http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/universe/s/sourcepackage]; available for all supported architectures or some subset ? | 0. ''Availability:'' [http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/universe/j/java-access-bridge]; available for all supported architectures. |
| Line 11: | Line 7: |
| * Build dependency of ... * |
* Dependency of openjdk-6-jre |
| Line 14: | Line 9: |
| * [http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvekey.cgi?keyword=PRODUCT_NAME CVE entries]: ... * [http://secunia.com/search/?search=PRODUCT_NAME Secunia history]: ... * Any binaries running as root or suid/sgid ? Any daemons ? * Network activity: does it open any port ? Does it handle incoming network data ? * Does it directly (not through a library) process binary (video, audio, etc) or structured (PDF, etc) data ? * Any source code review performed ? (The approver will do a quick and shallow check.) |
* [http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvekey.cgi?keyword=java-access-bridge CVE entries]: None * [http://secunia.com/search/?search=java-access-bridge Secunia history]: None * No binaries, no daemons. * No network activity. * Source code review: Quick check. |
| Line 21: | Line 15: |
| * In what situations does the package not work out of the box without configuration ? * Does the package ask any debconf questions higher than priority 'medium' ? * [http://bugs.debian.org/src:SOURCE_PACKAGE_NAME Debian bugs]: (mention any that are particularly relevant, and any showstoppers) * [http://packages.qa.debian.org/S/SOURCE_PACKAGE_NAME.html Maintenance in Debian] is frenetic/vigorous/calm/dead ? * [http:// Upstream] is frenetic/vigorous/calm/dead ? * [http:// Upstream bug tracker]: (mention any particularly relevant or critical) * Hardware: Does this package deal with hardware and if so how exotic is it ? * Is there a test suite in the upstream source or packaging ? Is it enabled to run in the build ? |
* Package works out of the box without configuration. * [http://bugs.debian.org/src:java-access-bridge Debian bugs]: Just one (missing openjdk-6 dependency). * [http://packages.qa.debian.org/java-access-bridge Maintenance in Debian] is calm (openjdk-6 is not yet part of unstable). * [http://ftp.gnome.org/pub/GNOME/sources/java-access-bridge] is doing regular releases. * [http://bugzilla.gnome.org/buglist.cgi?query=java-access-bridge Upstream bug tracker]: No critical reports. * No test suite in the upstream source. |
| Line 30: | Line 22: |
| * [http://www.pathname.com/fhs/ FHS], [http://www.de.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ Debian Policy] compliance ? * [http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer/column/libpkg-guide/libpkg-guide.html Debian library packaging guide] standards compliance ? * Packaging system (debhelper/cdbs/dbs) ? Patch system ? Any packaging oddities ? |
* Package is compliant to [http://www.pathname.com/fhs/ FHS], [http://www.de.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ Debian Policy]. * Packaging system: debhelper. Patch system: None. |
| Line 34: | Line 25: |
| * ... * Are these all in main ? 0. ''Background information:'' * The general purpose and context of the package should be clear from the package's debian/control file. If it isn't then please explain. * What do upstream call this software ? Has it had different names in the past ? |
* openjdk-6-jre (universe). * Needs to be migrated to main at the same time as openjdk-6. |
| Line 42: | Line 30: |
| MIR bug: [https://launchpad.net/bugs/BUGNUMBER] | MIR bug: [https://launchpad.net/bugs/246351] |
| Line 44: | Line 32: |
| ''The author of this report should put their name here; reviewers will add comments etc. too'' | Initial MIR: Matthias Klose |
Main Inclusion Report for java-access-bridge
Requirements
Availability: [http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/universe/j/java-access-bridge]; available for all supported architectures.
Rationale:
- Dependency of openjdk-6-jre
Security:
[http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvekey.cgi?keyword=java-access-bridge CVE entries]: None
[http://secunia.com/search/?search=java-access-bridge Secunia history]: None
- No binaries, no daemons.
- No network activity.
- Source code review: Quick check.
Quality assurance:
- Package works out of the box without configuration.
[http://bugs.debian.org/src:java-access-bridge Debian bugs]: Just one (missing openjdk-6 dependency).
[http://packages.qa.debian.org/java-access-bridge Maintenance in Debian] is calm (openjdk-6 is not yet part of unstable).
[http://ftp.gnome.org/pub/GNOME/sources/java-access-bridge] is doing regular releases.
[http://bugzilla.gnome.org/buglist.cgi?query=java-access-bridge Upstream bug tracker]: No critical reports.
- No test suite in the upstream source.
Standards compliance:
Package is compliant to [http://www.pathname.com/fhs/ FHS], [http://www.de.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ Debian Policy].
- Packaging system: debhelper. Patch system: None.
Dependencies:
- openjdk-6-jre (universe).
- Needs to be migrated to main at the same time as openjdk-6.
Reviewers
MIR bug: [https://launchpad.net/bugs/246351]
Initial MIR: Matthias Klose
MainInclusionReportJavaAccessBridge (last edited 2008-08-06 16:35:51 by localhost)