BetterSpamFiltering

Differences between revisions 1 and 2
⇤ ← Revision 1 as of 2006-03-16 16:35:55 →
Size: 1003
Editor: ua-83-227-230-228
Comment:
← Revision 2 as of 2006-03-16 16:37:19 → ⇥
Size: 983
Editor: ua-83-227-230-228
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 16: Line 16:
John has his own smtp/imap server setup for small group of people where mail is processed by procmail to weed out spam at delivery. When clients are using Evolution to declare mail as spam or ham this information should be processed on the server doing the filtering, preferably without the blocking delay that Evolution currently forces upon the user, so that spam is moved to a special IMAP folder for spam ("Junk"?). John has his own smtp/imap server setup for small group of people where mail is processed by procmail to weed out spam at delivery. When clients are using Evolution to declare mail as spam or ham this information should be processed on the server, preferably without the blocking delay that Evolution currently forces upon the user, so that spam is moved to a special IMAP folder for spam ("Junk"?).

  • Launchpad Entry:

  • Created:

  • Contributors: JohnNilsson

  • Packages affected: Evolution

Summary

JohnNilsson: I have ignored the basic needs this spec should adress, because I don't know the details. I just created it to add my special case before I forget.

Rationale

Use cases

John has his own smtp/imap server setup for small group of people where mail is processed by procmail to weed out spam at delivery. When clients are using Evolution to declare mail as spam or ham this information should be processed on the server, preferably without the blocking delay that Evolution currently forces upon the user, so that spam is moved to a special IMAP folder for spam ("Junk"?).

Scope

Design

Implementation

Code

Data preservation and migration

Outstanding issues

BoF agenda and discussion

CategorySpec

BetterSpamFiltering (last edited 2008-08-06 16:15:10 by localhost)