NattyRoadmap

Differences between revisions 4 and 5
⇤ ← Revision 4 as of 2010-10-20 02:02:22 →
Size: 2269
Editor: ip72-213-131-215
Comment:
← Revision 5 as of 2010-10-20 13:23:39 → ⇥
Size: 2947
Editor: ip72-213-131-215
Comment: refined scope
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 13: Line 13:
We need to improv our relationships within the community and set goals for the Natty cycle that will improve our ability to make the community onboarding experience as easy as possible. We need to have clear communication with areas of the community we are mentoring people for and provide specific roadmap for each area of interest.
The Beginners Team membership process is the vehicle we use to mentor individuals. Each prospective member chooses a Focus Group (an area of interest) and is assigned a mentor proficient in that area of the community. By the time a prospect becomes a full member they should be fairly proficient in their area of interest. Being the first experience a user has with the community it is important that we are providing the best possible experience. We need to adequately equip the individual for success in the area(s) of the community for which they are interested. What is the criteria for proficient in the different areas of the community and how will that fit into out mentor program.

The Beginners Team needs strong relationships and clear avenues of communication with the areas of the community we are mentoring people to participate in. This will ensure a healthy collaboration, the sharing of best practices, and minimise duplication of effort.
Line 17: Line 20:
The Beginners Team has transitioned from a support group to a mentoring group. As this transition has happened a lot of our processes and guidelines have been implied instead of clearly outlined. Other structures do not fit our current goals. Reviewing and formalizing our processes will provide a clear path for beginners and improve the effectiveness of our project. The Beginners Team has transitioned from a small forum support group to a multi faceted mentoring team. As this transition has happened some of our processes and guidelines have not kept pace. Alot of the membership procceses have been implied instead of explicit. Reviewing and formalizing our membership and mentoring processes will provide a clear path for beginners and improve the effectiveness of our project.
Line 30: Line 33:

{*} Review and evaluate our membership process and determine the best path for mentoring in each area of the community. Does the membership process for each Focus Group best prepare someone for that area of the community? What is the standard for proficiency in each area of the community.
<<BR>>
Line 31: Line 37:
<<BR>>
{*} Review and evaluate our membership process and determine the best path for mentoring in each area of the community. Does the membership process for each Focus Group best prepare someone for that area of the community? What is the standard for proficiency in each area of the community.

Summary

The Ubuntu Beginners Team exists to enhance the initial experience of new Ubuntu users and to guide existing Ubuntu users to become part of the global Ubuntu community.

The Beginners Team membership process is the vehicle we use to mentor individuals. Each prospective member chooses a Focus Group (an area of interest) and is assigned a mentor proficient in that area of the community. By the time a prospect becomes a full member they should be fairly proficient in their area of interest. Being the first experience a user has with the community it is important that we are providing the best possible experience. We need to adequately equip the individual for success in the area(s) of the community for which they are interested. What is the criteria for proficient in the different areas of the community and how will that fit into out mentor program.

The Beginners Team needs strong relationships and clear avenues of communication with the areas of the community we are mentoring people to participate in. This will ensure a healthy collaboration, the sharing of best practices, and minimise duplication of effort.

Rationale

The Beginners Team has transitioned from a small forum support group to a multi faceted mentoring team. As this transition has happened some of our processes and guidelines have not kept pace. Alot of the membership procceses have been implied instead of explicit. Reviewing and formalizing our membership and mentoring processes will provide a clear path for beginners and improve the effectiveness of our project.

User stories

Fred is new to the community. He is not sure what areas he might be best suited to contribute to.

Bob is new to the community. Bob has been a developer for many years and knows he is interested in Ubuntu development.

Implementation

Ubuntu Review and evaluate our membership process and determine the best path for mentoring in each area of the community. Does the membership process for each Focus Group best prepare someone for that area of the community? What is the standard for proficiency in each area of the community.
Ubuntu Develop a plan to better forge relationships with the areas of the community we are mentoring people for.

Unresolved issues

This should highlight any issues that should be addressed in further specifications.

BoF agenda and discussion

Use this section to take notes during the BoF; if you keep it in the approved spec, use it for summarising what was discussed and note any options that were rejected.

CategorySpec

BeginnersTeam/Specs/NattyRoadmap (last edited 2010-11-02 19:47:56 by ip72-213-131-215)